康德的悲剧(康德笔下的尊严)

人的尊严康德道德形而上学基础[1]第2章第19节最后一个自然段,其全文是:,接下来我们就来聊聊关于康德的悲剧?以下内容大家不妨参考一二希望能帮到您!

康德的悲剧(康德笔下的尊严)

康德的悲剧

人的尊严

康德道德形而上学基础[1]第2章第19节最后一个自然段,其全文是:

From what was said a little time ago we can now easily explain how it comes about that, although in the concept of duty we think of subjection to the law, yet we also at the same time attribute to the person who fulfils all his duties a certain sublimity and dignity. For it is not in so far as he is subject to the law that he has sublimity, but rather in so far as, in regard to this very same law, he is at the same time its author and is subordinated to it only on this ground. We have also shown above how neither fear nor inclination, but only reverence for the law, is the motive which can give an action moral worth. Our own will, provided it were to act only under the condition of being able to make universal law by means of its maxims-this ideal will which can be ours is the proper object of reverence; and the dignity of man consists precisely in his capacity to make universal law, although only on condition of being himself also subject to the law he makes.

笔者另行[2]翻译如下:

从稍早说过的内容,即可轻松解释本末由来,在义务的概念之下,我们想到的是服从普适律;与此同时,我们也向克尽义务者报之以某种程度崇高和尊严。并不是在服从普适律的限度内,他赢得崇高;就是这同一普适律,他是普适律的作者同时也就因为这他才服从普适律,在这个限度内他赢得崇高。我们也在此前说明,既非怕也非好,反倒是对普适律的敬畏,才是行为具有道德价值的动机。我们自己的意志,如若借助它的行为规则足以立普适律,仅仅在这样的条件下,这可能属于我们的理想意志,才是敬畏的合适对象。人的尊严的的确确来自于,有能力立普适律,尽管在他自己又服从他所立普适律的条件下为之。

[1] Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (H. J. Paton trans., Harper Torchbooks 1964) (1785).

[2] 参见康德:《道德形而上学原理》,上海:上海人民出版社2007年苗力田译本,第61页;康德:《道德形而上学奠基》,北京:人民出版社2013年杨云飞译本,第79-80页.

,

免责声明:本文仅代表文章作者的个人观点,与本站无关。其原创性、真实性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,对本文以及其中全部或者部分内容文字的真实性、完整性和原创性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并自行核实相关内容。文章投诉邮箱:anhduc.ph@yahoo.com

    分享
    投诉
    首页