琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(1)

分享兴趣,传播快乐,增长见闻,留下美好。亲爱的您,这里是LearningYard学苑!

Share interests, spread happiness, increase knowledge, and leave beauty behind. Dear you, this is LearningYard Academy!

今天的琦文分享栏目将带领大家学习博士论文《基于政府干预和企业合作的供应链绿色技术投资研究》。

Today's Qi Wen sharing program will lead you to study your master's thesis "Factors affecting bidding strategy of national collective procurement drugs from the perspective of game Theory".

小编将从思维导图、精读内容、知识补充三个板块为大家带来《基于政府干预和企业合作的供应链绿色技术投资研究》第五节污染排放权限额可交易下具有绿色技术投资的多期供应链网络均衡的精读分析。

I will bring you a close reading analysis of the multi-period supply chain network equilibrium with green technology investment under the tradable pollution emission allowance in Section V of the Study on Green Technology Investment in Supply Chains Based on Government Intervention and Corporate Cooperation in three sections: mind map, close reading content, and knowledge supplement.

1

思维导图

Beginning of

Winter

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(2)

2

精读内容

Beginning of

Winter

作者首先指出美国政府1990年开始施行污染排放可交易政策,鼓励企业进行改革创新,我国起步较晚,从2012年开始试点工作,并在2021年将排放量达到2.6W吨二氧化碳的单位纳入交易体系并进行市场化交易。

The authors first point out that the U.S. government started to implement a policy of tradable pollution emissions in 1990 to encourage enterprises to reform and innovate, while China started late and began pilot work in 2012 and will include units with emissions up to 2.6 W tons of CO2 in the trading system and conduct market-based trading in 2021.

逻辑关系上,作者从政策实施前期存在的困难,存在一个短期和长期决策的问题。同时一些大型企业的实践证明绿色技术投资长期会给企业带来成本节约和经济效益。并提出现有文献对污染可交易政策主要使用逆向归纳法,对于大规模的供应链网络并不适用,结合已有文献,作者认为该文章的创新性体现在:多期模型,反应长期影响;绿色投资技术函数为显函数。

Logically, the authors look at the difficulties that exist in the early stages of policy implementation and there is a problem of short-term and long-term decisions. Meanwhile the practice of some large enterprises proves that green technology investment will bring cost savings and economic benefits to enterprises in the long run. And it is proposed that the existing literature mainly uses the inverse induction method for pollution tradable policy, which is not applicable for large-scale supply chain network. Combining with the existing literature, the authors believe that the innovation of the article is reflected in: multi-period model, which responds to long-term impact; green investment technology function is an explicit function.

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(3)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(4)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(5)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(6)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(7)

制造商的利润由以下几个部分决定:销售收入、生产成本、绿色技术投资(固定成本和可变成本)、交易成本、碳交易权的购买成本或销售收入、排污成本。

A manufacturer's profit is determined by the following components: sales revenue, production costs, investment in green technologies (fixed and variable costs), transaction costs, purchase costs of carbon trading rights or sales revenue, and emissions costs.

随后作者计算了制造商以自己最大利益为目标的生产量、绿色技术投资水平、污染排放量和排放权持有量的纳什均衡,以及计算了排放权交易市场上的纳什均衡条件。

The authors then calculate the Nash equilibrium for the amount of production, the level of investment in green technology, the amount of pollution emissions and the amount of emission rights held by manufacturers aiming at their own best interests, as well as the Nash equilibrium conditions in the emission trading market.

为了让整个供应链达到均衡条件,则需要满足产品市场和污染排放权交易市场的双重均衡。

In order for the whole supply chain to reach equilibrium, it is necessary to satisfy the dual equilibrium of product market and pollution emission trading market.

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(8)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(9)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(10)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(11)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(12)

作者以两个制造商向两个地区销售产品并向两个排放点排放污染物的情况做了算例分析。并得到以下结论:1消费者绿色偏好的不断增强,能有效促使企业加大绿色技术投资,生产出更多绿色度更高的产品,获取更多的利润。2政府污染配额的不断减少能有效促使企业加大绿色技术投资并提供更多绿色度更高的产品,也促进企业更多地参与污染排放权的交易,但利润水平降低。3竞争的加剧会促使污染排放权的市场化交易,但是企业绿色技术水平的分化将越来越明显。

The authors made an arithmetic analysis with two manufacturers selling products to two regions and emitting pollutants to two emission points. And the following conclusions are obtained: 1 The increasing green preference of consumers can effectively motivate enterprises to invest more in green technology, produce more products with higher greenness, and obtain more profits.2 The decreasing government pollution quota can effectively motivate enterprises to invest more in green technology and provide more products with higher greenness, and also promote enterprises to participate more in the trading of pollution emission rights, but with lower profit level.3 Increased competition will lead to market-based trading of pollution emission rights, but the differentiation of enterprises' green technology levels will become more and more obvious.

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(13)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(14)

琦文分享六十四(琦文分享六十四)(15)

3知识补充

寡头竞争:在寡头竞争的条件下,在一个行业中只有少数几家大企业,它们所生产和销售的某种产品占这种产品的总产量和市场销售总量的绝大部分比重,它们之间的竞争就是寡头竞争。

Oligopolistic competition: Under the conditions of oligopolistic competition, there are only a few large enterprises in an industry, which produce and sell a certain product accounting for the vast majority of the total production and total market sales of this product, and the competition among them is oligopolistic competition.

今天的分享就到这里了。如果您对今天的文章有独特的想法,欢迎给我们留言,让我们相约明天,祝您今天过得开心快乐!

That's all for today's sharing. If you have a unique idea for today's article, feel free to leave a message and let's meet tomorrow. I wish you a happy and happy day!

参考资料:deepl

参考文献:《基于政府干预和企业合作的供应链绿色技术投资研究》(源自知网)

本文由LearningYard学苑整理并发出,如有侵权,请联系删除。

,

免责声明:本文仅代表文章作者的个人观点,与本站无关。其原创性、真实性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,对本文以及其中全部或者部分内容文字的真实性、完整性和原创性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并自行核实相关内容。文章投诉邮箱:anhduc.ph@yahoo.com

    分享
    投诉
    首页