26个sci写作教程合集（琦文分享二十七）

本期的琦文分享栏目将继续带领大家学习硕士论文《基于低碳政策的新能源汽车产业供应链主体行为决策研究》的第四章，第五章，分析该论文的合作演化博弈模型以及结论与展望。

The Qiwen sharing column of this issue will continue to lead you to study the fourth and fifth chapters of the master thesis "Research on the Behavioral Decision-making of New Energy Vehicle Industry Supply Chain Based on Low-Carbon Policy", analyzing the cooperative evolutionary game model and conclusions of the revised thesis with Outlook.

第四章

作者首先提出政府的激励机制对绿色供应链发展的必要性，然后指出定价对供应链整体收益的影响，因此本文研究基于定价的合作演化博弈。本文构建了政府参与下，一个制造商和一个零售商构成的新能源汽车产业供应链，该模型的基本假设与符号说明如下：

The author first proposes the necessity of the government's incentive mechanism for the development of green supply chain, and then points out the impact of pricing on the overall revenue of the supply chain. Therefore, this paper studies the cooperative evolutionary game based on pricing. This paper constructs a new energy vehicle industry supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer with the participation of the government. The basic assumptions and symbols of the model are explained as follows:

然后作者构建了制造企业占主导地位的Stackelberg博弈模型，求解了分散决策下的最优定价、需求和收益。

Then the author constructs a Stackelberg game model dominated by manufacturing enterprises, and solves the optimal pricing, demand and revenue under decentralized decision-making.

然后求解制造企业和零售商采取集中决策的方式来确定产品定价。

Then solve the problem that manufacturers and retailers take centralized decision-making to determine product pricing.

求解了集中决策和分散决策的的最优定价、订货量以及收益，随后对这两种情况进行比较分析。

The optimal pricing, order quantity and profit of centralized decision-making and decentralized decision-making are solved, and then the two situations are compared and analyzed.

根据上述的分析，集中决策的定价方式更优，但是若任一方占据主动位置，他们将获得更多的利益，因此在一开始就选择集中决策的情况，因此在这种利润冲突下，两方存在一个长期的博弈过程。

According to the above analysis, the pricing method of centralized decision-making is better, but if either party occupies the active position, they will obtain more benefits, so they choose the case of centralized decision-making at the beginning, so under this profit conflict, the two parties will There is a long-term game process.

该基于定价的演化博弈的假设如下：

The assumptions of this pricing-based evolutionary game are as follows:

然后是正常演化博弈模型的求解过程。

Then there is the solution process of the normal evolutionary game model.

随后，对演化均衡点进行稳定性分析。求解出不同条件下的演化稳定点。

Then, the stability analysis is carried out on the evolution equilibrium point. Solve the evolutionary stable points under different conditions.

将上文的不同情况结合实际的企业行为和消费者行为进行分类，并对具体的演化稳定策略进行分析。并绘制相应的相位图。

The different situations above are combined with the actual corporate behavior and consumer behavior to classify, and the specific evolutionary stabilization strategy is analyzed. and plot the corresponding phase diagram.

随后，作者针对该演化博弈模型进行了数值模拟与仿真分析。

Then, the author carried out numerical simulation and simulation analysis for the evolutionary game model.

集中决策的模式可以产生更大的利润。但由于各成员更追求自身利益的最优，以及企业之间沟通交流等原因，制造企业和零售商不一定会选择合作定价。因此，可以通过制定一定的契约，如收益分享契约来实现成员之间的合作。下面对制造企业和零售商之间的合作提出一些建议。

A model of centralized decision-making can generate greater profits. However, due to the fact that each member pursues the best interests of its own, as well as the communication between enterprises, manufacturing enterprises and retailers may not necessarily choose cooperative pricing. Therefore, cooperation among members can be achieved by formulating certain contracts, such as revenue sharing contracts. Below are some suggestions for collaboration between manufacturers and retailers.

第五章

本文最后一章节，作者先进行了文章的总结。借助演化博弈理论以及 Matlab 等软件，对新能源汽车低碳供应链的博弈问题展开讨论，通过对演化的趋势和最终结果的分析，得出博弈过程中各相关影响因素在新能源汽车供应链低碳进程中发挥的作用，为低碳供应链的构建，实现低碳环保的目标完善理论依据。并得到以下结论：

In the last chapter of this paper, the author makes a summary of the article. With the help of evolutionary game theory and software such as Matlab, the game problem of the new energy vehicle low-carbon supply chain is discussed. Through the analysis of the evolution trend and the final result, it is concluded that the relevant influencing factors in the game process are low in the new energy vehicle supply chain. The role played in the carbon process improves the theoretical basis for the construction of a low-carbon supply chain and the realization of the goal of low-carbon environmental protection. and came to the following conclusions:

参考资料：谷歌翻译

参考文献：《基于低碳政策的新能源汽车产业供应链主体行为决策研究》

本文由LearningYard学苑原创，如有侵权，请联系删除。

,