考研英语常用的题型（你的考研英语新题型真的不需要蒙）

考研英语新题型中的七选五可能是所有考生的心头病，不要紧，今天着重讲解一下7选5，而且小编预测，考研英语7选5出题概率会很大，下面我们就来聊聊关于考研英语常用的题型?接下来我们就一起去了解一下吧!

考研英语常用的题型

考研英语新题型中的七选五可能是所有考生的心头病，不要紧，今天着重讲解一下7选5，而且小编预测，考研英语7选5出题概率会很大。

7选5主要考察我们的是信息检索能力和信息匹配能力，说俗了就是考察你的眼神好不好，他并不考察对文章的深度理解。

而解题的核心准则是：

1. 全篇“烂大街”的词汇，不及各段特有的特征词汇给力

2. 组合出现特征词 最给力

3. 起承转合与感情色彩不容忽视

4. 数字、年代、特殊字符是命题人给我们的礼物

我来解释一下

一、匹配过程中不要用文章中烂大街的词汇。那些词无出不在，你用它来匹配，你不乱谁乱，我们要用个段中的特征词汇。就是空格前后的句子本段中独有的词汇，而不是其他段落所共有的词汇。

二，如果看到某个选项中蕴含了某个段落所特有的一系列词汇的组合的话，那么这个选项基本上就属于这个空格了。因为这些不断复现的词，它一而再再而三的告诉你，我属于这个段落。你看这个词都匹配上了，我真的属于这个段。另外一个词也匹配上了，我的确属于这个段位。甚至这些词汇之间的组合关系都和原文中的组合关系都是一样的。好了，做题主要靠的就是这些特征词的组合复现。

当然我们要检查这个选项填的对不对，当然要赋予选项填入过后上下文的起承转合是否顺畅、感情色彩是搭调。如果再有数字、年代、特殊字符加以佐证的话，我们对自己的选择更是确定无疑。

以2013新题型为例：

第一段

The social sciences are flourishing. As of 2005, there were almost half a million professional social scientists from all fields in the world, working both inside and outside academia. According to the World Social Science Report 2010, the number of social-science students worldwide has swollen by about 11% every year since 2000.

第一段没有空格跳过去。

---

第二段

【1】Yet this enormous resource is not contributing enough to today's global challenges, including climate change, security, sustainable development and health.

【2】(41) ____________________

【3】Humanity has the necessary agro-technological tools to eradicate hunger, from genetically engineered crops to artificial fertilizers.

【4】Here, too, the problems are social: the organization and distribution of food, wealth and prosperity.

[E] These issues all have root causes in human behavior: all require behavioral change and social innovations, as well as technological development. Stemming climate change, for example, is as much about changing consumption patterns and promoting tax acceptance as it is about developing clean energy.

第二段有四句话，空格在第二句。根据我们课堂上所讲过的就近原则。一和三与空格之间的关系是最密切的。先来看看一，一再做因果分析。叫this enormous resource is not contributing enough to today's global challenges。前者并不是当今这些挑战的原因之所在，那原因在哪儿呢？我们现在不就是要找一个分析因果的句子吗？把句子一再看一看。说当今的挑战包括什么呢？包括一系列的加黑因素（climate change, security, sustainable development and health）

好了，复述一系列的加黑的因素。下面我们要带着两个特征，哪一个选项在做因果分析？哪一个选项能承接上面一系列的加黑因素？找来找去，同时满足这两个条件的是E选项。那么E选项说了These issues all have root causes in human behavior 这些因素，他们的根源在于人类的行为，这不就是在分析原因吗？现在把它填进来两句话连着读，resource并没有导致这些挑战，挑战的原因在于人类的行为。顺不顺，顺了本题就结束了。

---

第三段

【1】(42) ____________________

【2】This is a shame—the community should be grasping the opportunity to raise its influence in the real world.

【3】To paraphrase the great social scientist Joseph Schumpeter: there is no radical innovation without creative destruction.

[F] Despite these factors, many social scientists seem reluctant to tackle such problems. And in Europe, some are up in arms over a proposal to drop a specific funding category for social-science research and to integrate it within cross-cutting topics of sustainable development.

再来看看第二题，第三段有三句话。42题是本段的首句。既然是本段的首句，就可能得看一看上一段的末句。上一段的末句是第二段的第四句。叫the problems are social:那么都包括什么呢？包括一系列的加黑因素（the organization and distribution of food, wealth and prosperity）

那么现在我们知道42前面是一系列的负向的名词。后面This is a shame，This是单数还是复数，单数指的是一种情况，一种行为，一种趋势或者是一件事情。而shame消极负向评价。我们现在带着这两层因素去找答案。

F选项 many social scientists seem reluctant to tackle such problems.

such problems对的是谁？对的是the problems，那是刚才第二段末句的the problems。但是F选项一开头说these factors这些因素是单数还是复数？既然是复数，那么它对的是谁？对的是刚才是第二段末句的the organization and distribution of food, wealth and prosperity

好了，那么接着往下推进，many social scientists seem reluctant to tackle such problems.他们不情愿去处理这些问题。告诉我这是褒义词还是贬义词？贬义词，F选项中的第二句：some are up in arms over a proposal to drop a specific funding ........他们甚至还要做一件事叫做drop a specific funding，好事还是坏事？贬义的。那么把它填到42里面，感情色彩好像是对的。但是能否得到印证呢？我们现在只知道such problems对的是刚才上一段的the problems

these factors对的是 organization and distribution of food, wealth and prosperity.

那么这里的to drop a specific funding对的是a shame，感情色彩是对的

那么还有没有别的佐证了？当然有，往下推进，我们看看第三段第二句破折号后面the community指谁？指的是 many social scientists ，以及some其中的一部分人，指的是科学界的一部分人他们应该提高自己的影响力，这是作者提出的建议。在这里如果把F选项填到42的话，他们不作为，他们还要降低对科研的funding，前面都是消极负向的行为，后面你们应该怎么做，应该提升影响力，to raise its influence 作者给的建议是解决刚才F选项中提出的一些负向的一些问题。

---

第四段

【1】 Today, the social sciences are largely focused on disciplinary problems and internal scholarly debates, rather than on topics with external impact.

【2】 Analyses reveal that the number of papers including the keywords “environmental change” or “climate change” have increased rapidly since 2004.

【3】 (43) ____________________

[B] However, the numbers are still small: in 2010, about 1,600 of the 100,000 social-sciences papers published globally included one of these keywords.

第43题是第四段的段末，离它最近的句子是第二句。我们今天不断的重复就近原则，要看最近的。

the keywords对着b选项的these keywords，那么since 2004对的是一个时间在10年。

04年以来，时间不断地向后延展。那10年不就是04年以后的事情吗？在这之前叫做the keywords

have increased rapidly,后面the numbers are still small。前褒义后贬义，对的起这里的 However，转折关系成立。

---

第五段

When social scientists do tackle practical issues, their scope is often local: Belgium is interested mainly in the effects of poverty on Belgium, for example. And whether the community’s work contributes much to an overall accumulation of knowledge is doubtful.

---

第六段

【1】The problem is not necessarily the amount of available funding.

【2】(44) ____________________

【3】This is an adequate amount so long as it is aimed in the right direction.

【4】Social scientists who complain about a lack of funding should not expect more in today’s economic climate.

[G] During the late 1990s, national spending on social sciences and the humanities as a percentage of all research and development funds—including government, higher education, non-profit and corporate—varied from around 4% to 25%; in most European nations, it is about 15%.

第六段是44题，前面提到的是funding. 后面说的是This is an adequate amount

那么我们带着funding，带着amount ，就找到了另外一句话G选项

G选项里复现的词叫national spending，这不就是国家出的资吗？ funds不就等于funding吗？这叫做信息词复现一致。后面的第三句话This，必须指一个单数，这里 和G选项的it 所指的是一样的，单数对单数。amount 指的15%，数量对数量。

---

第七段

【1】 The trick is to direct these funds better.

【2】 The European Union Framework funding programs have long had a category specifically targeted at social scientists.

【3】 This year, it was proposed that the system be changed: Horizon 2020, a new program to be enacted in 2014, would not have such a category.

【4】 This has resulted in protests from social scientists.

【5】 But the intention is not to neglect social science; rather, the complete opposite.

【6】 (45) ____________________

【7】 That should create more collaborative endeavors and help to develop projects aimed directly at solving global problems.

[C] The idea is to force social scientists to integrate their work with other categories, including health and demographic change; food security; marine research and the bio-economy, clean, efficient energy; and inclusive, innovative and secure societies.

第七段第45题前前后后句子颇多，千万不可忘前面说过的就近原则，45题在第六段，那么五段和七段不可错过。

第五段But 把前文的1、2、3、4给否定掉了。the intention is not to neglect social science，

the intention对的是The idea，想法对意图，名词对名词。is not to 和is to，连句式都对的如此工整to force social scientists to do something，是让社会科学家去做某件事，那么让社会科学家做某件事，不就是不要忽视社会科学的功效吗？

再看C选项 The idea is to force social scientists to integrate their work with other categories

要把自己的研究和别的领域整合起来，不就等于本段第7句话中的协同作业吗？collaborate合作

---

最后做个总结

1-特征词组合复现是你的解题依据，不要用烂大街的词

2-可以起承转合与感情色彩来做题，但是特征词永远是关键

3-做这种题一定要把心静下来，要用就近原则