雅思作文肥胖问题（提升高脂肪食品的价格可以缓解肥胖问题吗）

More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people say that the price increase of fattening foods will solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?#英语#

越来越多人体重肥胖。有人说提升高脂肪食品的价格可以缓解肥胖问题。同意反对？

obesity 肥胖

Inflate 涨价

Curb 遏制

Diet 饮食

Susceptible 受影响

Grocery 副食品

Plight 窘境

Well-off 富有的

越来越多人体重肥胖。有人说提升高脂肪食品的价格可以缓解肥胖问题。

This is a great essay on viewpoints and talks about how to solve the problem of obesity. The topic puts forward a point of view, increasing the price of fattening food can solve people's obesity problem. Then, we have to think about two things, whether fattening food is the cause of obesity, and secondly, see whether raising prices can effectively solve it.

这是一道观点类大作文，聊得是肥胖问题如何解决。题目提出了一个观点，提升fattening food的价格能够解决人们的肥胖问题。那么，我们要思考两件事情，fattening food 是不是导致肥胖的原因，其次再来看提高价格是否有效解决。#饮食健康#

有一些人他们吃不起更贵的健康的食物，只能更多地吃这些垃圾食品。

First of all, there are actually many reasons for people's obesity. Unhealthy diet, lack of exercise, and poor body metabolism may all lead to obesity. Fattening food is because of high calorie, high fat and other factors, if it is taken for a long time, it is easy to cause obesity. There is no doubt about this.#教育#

提高致肥食物的价格能减少肥胖写作思维。

首先，导致人们肥胖的原因其实有很多，饮食不健康、缺乏运动、身体代谢差等都可能会导致肥胖。其中fattening food 因为高热量、高脂肪等因素，如果长期摄入确实容易导致身体肥胖。这一点是没有疑问的。

But why do many people who know these foods are unhealthy still eat them? In addition to delicious food, but also because these foods are cheap. There are some people who cannot afford more expensive and healthy foods and can only eat more of these junk foods.

但是许多人明知道这些食物不健康的人为什么还会食用？除了好吃外，还因为这些食物便宜。有一些人他们吃不起更贵的健康的食物，只能更多地吃这些垃圾食品。

有一些人他们吃不起更贵的健康的食物，只能更多地吃这些垃圾食品。

Therefore, simply increasing the price of fattening food will not solve the problem of obesity. One is because the obesity problem is originally caused by a variety of factors. Some people may have poor metabolism and do not like exercise. Even if they eat healthy food, they will be obese. Second, for those who are rich, no matter how high the price is, it will not affect whether they eat this kind of food, but for the poor, it will increase their living costs and burdens, as long as these foods are cheaper than healthy foods. , They will still eat and the cost of living is higher than before, or they will look for alternative cheap foods that may have other problems.#食物#

因此，单纯提高fattening food的价格并不能解决肥胖问题。一是因为肥胖问题本来就是由多种因素产生的，有的人可能代谢差以及不爱运动，哪怕他吃得比较健康也会肥胖。二是对于那些有钱人来说，再怎么提高价格也不会影响他们是否食用这类食物，但对于贫穷的人来说，这会增加他们的生活成本和负担，只要这些食物比健康食物便宜，他们依然会食用且生活成本比以前更高，或是他们会去寻找替代的可能有其他问题的便宜食物来替代。

Given that obesity has become an impending trend today, it is assumed that a hike in the prices of fattening foods will curb the problem. However, I would say it is oversimplified to pin the hope on inflating the prices of junk food since the approach does not do much to encourage a healthy diet.

鉴于今天肥胖已成为一种迫在眉睫的趋势，人们假设增肥食品价格的上涨将遏制这一问题。然而，我认为将希望寄托在垃圾食品价格上涨上是过于简单化了，因为这种方法对鼓励健康饮食没有多大作用。

易受影响的大多数人在购买杂货时不可避免地受到低价的影响，而此类食品往往含有过多的糖或脂肪。

Indeed, it is not difficult to understand why increasing the prices of fattening food is considered effective to constrain the trend towards overweight. Those who think in this way opt to attribute the conundrum to people’s unhealthy diet: the impressionable majority are inevitably susceptible to the low prices when shopping for groceries, while such foods tend to contain excessive sugar or fat. Based on this understanding, some people convict that by inflating costs of fattening foods can compel consumers to buy more healthy products.

事实上，不难理解为什么提高育肥食品的价格被认为可以有效抑制超重趋势。有这种想法的人选择将难题归咎于人们的不健康饮食：易受影响的大多数人在购买杂货时不可避免地受到低价的影响，而此类食品往往含有过多的糖或脂肪。基于这种理解，一些人认为通过提高增肥食品的成本可以迫使消费者购买更多健康产品。

Plausible thought the above reasoning seems, I would say that to make junk foods less affordable does not have much of a role to play in improving public health. The overriding concern here is: those championing the claim in question reach their conclusion based on an erroneous causal connection between the problem and its reason – what exactly results in people’s bias for junk foods is their economic plight: those living in poverty are intimidated by the prohibitive prices of quality foods (i.e., fresh vegetables, fruits, etc.) and turn to less expensive counterparts. With this in mind, to increase fattening foods affordability will not change reality on the ground, whereas other options may be more practical, with one measure being governmental subsidy for healthy diet among less well-off class.

上述推理看似合理，我想说的是，让垃圾食品变得更便宜，在改善公共健康方面没有太大作用。这里最令人担忧的是：那些支持相关主张的人根据问题与其原因之间的错误因果关系得出结论——究竟导致人们偏爱垃圾食品的是他们的经济困境：那些生活在贫困中的人被高品质食品（即新鲜蔬菜、水果等）的高昂价格，转向更便宜的同类产品。考虑到这一点，提高增肥食品的可负担性不会改变当地的现实，而其他选择可能更实用，其中一项措施是政府补贴贫困阶层的健康饮食。#健康解密#

From what has been discussed, I would say that inflating fattening foods will improve people’s healthy diet, while a more practical solution is to make quality food more affordable.

综上所述，我想说的是增加增肥食品会改善人们的健康饮食，而更实际的解决方案是让优质食品更实惠。